liliaeth: (scira)
[personal profile] liliaeth

I don’t like Firefly.

Big part of the reason for that is the lack of memorable characters, and the shitty worldbuilding.

But it’s not just that, it’s the whole premise of the series.

By the very rules of the series, the Browncoats, aka Mal’s group who lost the war and the people we’re supposed to see as the good guys, are basically coded as confederates.

Think about that for a second

Now I do agree that Whedon was limited due to the series getting cancelled so soon, but if, as I would have hoped, we’d eventually be lead to come to realize that the browncoats were in the wrong, like the people they were modeled after, then you’d think that Whedon would have used the opportunity of the movie to show just that. Instead,he  wasted that chance on making the Alliance even more clearly the bad guys.

And the thing is, Whedon is a liberal, so why didn’t he realize that his very concept of his series sent some damn unfortunate implications. Did he really not realize what message that his very premise was sending?

(and that doesn’t even get me  started on how a world setting supposedly build on the idea of Asian and American cultures meshing, up to the point of them regularly using Chinese in every day conversation, did not have a single regular Chinese character. )

I don’t hate Whedon, but looking back at pretty much most of Whedon’s work, I do think he needs to work on his race issues.

Date: 2015-07-12 09:04 pm (UTC)
ext_12572: (Default)
From: [identity profile] sinanju.livejournal.com
I don't think you're wrong that the Browncoats read as Confederates, given that they fought a (losing) war against the central government, but that's a framework with a lot of wiggle room in it. There's nothing in the show to suggest that slavery was an issue in any sense--and that makes a big difference. I think that idea (an overbearing central government demanding complete allegiance and obedience, and a population who resist that demand) can resonate with a lot of people who would nonetheless condemn the Confederate cause.

But while I enjoy the show, yes, the worldbuilding was crap. They left Earth That Was behind...which suggests the ability to reach other star systems, but then apparently EVERYONE went to this ONE star system and found (or terraformed) a zillion worlds all within a few days or weeks of one another. Say what? If any other human colonized worlds exist, they're never mentioned, and the existence of such--and the tech to reach them--would seem to be something that we'd expect to hear about if that were the case.

Plus, the notion that "horses don't need spare parts" so colonies are started with low tech because spare parts won't be available for a long, long time doens't mesh with a world where ordinary not-rich folks (like those who've lost a brutal war recently) can obtain (and can AFFORD) spaceships and make a living (thin, perhaps, but a living) ferrying passengers and cargo from planet to planet. Why don't all those colonists get a Sears & Roebuck catalog of all the glorious things available from the prosperous, high-tech core worlds on credit, or layaway or something? Those grasping corporations wouldn't hesitate to try to open all those potential markets when the means to reach them (cheap, affordable space travel) clearly exists.

Instead of dirt farmers (or in addition to them), the colonies would be mining and doing other resource extraction of raw materials to trade to the core worlds for finished goods.

Date: 2015-07-12 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paratti.livejournal.com
Whedon's economics is a shaky as his grasp of history.

Date: 2015-07-12 10:46 pm (UTC)
jerusha: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jerusha
I actually agree with you wholeheartedly. I read an article recently that talked about why the characters in Firefly were fairly terrible people, and that there are parts of the Alliance that could be read as a progressive utopia. Ah, here it is.

But, while I agree, I think it's important to recognize that the US started as a rebellion, and rebels against authority is a dearly loved myth of ours. I would bet that, if asked, Whedon would say that he was hearkening more towards our country's roots rather than the Confederacy, even if that doesn't actually come through in the story itself. The Old West is also a beloved myth, and there was certainly some callbacks to that, what with the space cowboys and all.

That doesn't mean, however, that those touchstones are without problems. There were massive problems with the world building, and when I learned what Whedon had eventually planned for Inara's storyline, I was appalled. (There are also serious problems with Inara's portrayal in general, since the narrative is at once accepting of her profession and very derogatory.)

September 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 28th, 2026 11:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios