(no subject)
Oct. 16th, 2008 10:23 pmJust something interesting I found while I was answering a comment on
ontd_political
What can I say, I occasionally like to check what I'm saying, esp. about my own country*g*
I also liked this page
For the record, I'm pro-life and pro-choice. I would never choose for abortion myself, but I'll fight for the right of any other woman to make her own decision in that regards.
I like the Belgian way of handling it. Abortion clinics require six days of counseling before an abortion is performed. It makes sure that the woman really wants an abortion, that she's given all the options outside of an abortion, that she knows her rights, the possibilities she has and the help she could get with her child in case she doesn't go through with the abortion.
In other words, it puts the woman, her decision and her choice central, rather than just put the emphasis on the fetus. And it makes sure that she isn't making a rash decision that she'll regret for the rest of her life, yet it doesn't force the woman to carry a child that could harm her health, either mental or physical, or cause her economic distress.
I know, government interference and all that... but I like government interference when it makes life better for people.
What can I say, I occasionally like to check what I'm saying, esp. about my own country*g*
I also liked this page
For the record, I'm pro-life and pro-choice. I would never choose for abortion myself, but I'll fight for the right of any other woman to make her own decision in that regards.
I like the Belgian way of handling it. Abortion clinics require six days of counseling before an abortion is performed. It makes sure that the woman really wants an abortion, that she's given all the options outside of an abortion, that she knows her rights, the possibilities she has and the help she could get with her child in case she doesn't go through with the abortion.
In other words, it puts the woman, her decision and her choice central, rather than just put the emphasis on the fetus. And it makes sure that she isn't making a rash decision that she'll regret for the rest of her life, yet it doesn't force the woman to carry a child that could harm her health, either mental or physical, or cause her economic distress.
I know, government interference and all that... but I like government interference when it makes life better for people.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 11:30 pm (UTC)Kathleen
no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 04:12 am (UTC)Basically this requirement means that only middle income and upper income women, plus women who live in big cities, can get abortions.
(you're on my husband's friend list, in case you're wondering why I'm reading this)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-17 05:55 am (UTC)That or allow planned parenthood, or how do you call that in the US, to help with the counseling, and then have the woman make her determination clear.
Or providing counseling at home. There's ways to get around that six hour drive, which is indeed long, if the government is willing to work at it and focus on the woman or girl in question, rather than on the unborn.
On top of that, another thing that helps keep our abortion rate low(one of the lowest in the world btw), is that we focus on sexual education at schools, birth control and providing help for new mothers.
Edit: for example, if a girl is still at school, there's no reason that her school counselor can't do the required counseling. And if every town has a planned parenthood office (not sure how it works), they could have someone there to fill that requirement, before sending her on a six hour drive)